Pricing Workers' Compensation Insurance
The actuarial methods and considerations unique to workers' compensation insurance pricing.
Rating Structure
Workers' compensation insurance pricing is built on a class code system maintained by the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) or independent state rating bureaus. Each class code represents a group of occupations with similar risk characteristics and has a base rate (called a loss cost or manual rate) reflecting the historical loss experience for that occupation category. There are hundreds of class codes, ranging from clerical office workers (among the lowest rated) to structural steel workers and underground miners (among the highest rated).
The premium for a policy equals the sum of each class code's rate multiplied by the corresponding payroll divided by 100. For example, if a class code has a rate of $5.00 per $100 of payroll and the employer has $1,000,000 in payroll for that class, the manual premium contribution is $50,000. Most employers have multiple class codes because their workforce includes different types of jobs. The total manual premium is the sum across all applicable class codes.
Experience Rating
Large accounts receive experience modifications (experience mods) based on their own loss history, adjusting premiums up or down relative to the class average. The experience modification factor compares the employer's actual losses over a multi-year period (typically three years, excluding the most recent year) to the expected losses for an average employer with the same payroll by class code.
The NCCI experience rating formula splits losses into primary losses (the first portion of each claim, typically the first $5,000 to $18,500 depending on the state and effective date) and excess losses (the remainder above the primary threshold). Primary losses receive full credibility in the formula because they are more stable and predictive at the individual employer level. Excess losses receive partial credibility because large loss amounts are more volatile and less reflective of the employer's ongoing risk management practices.
The experience modification factor equals (actual primary losses + weighted actual excess losses + expected excess losses times a ballast value) divided by (expected primary losses + expected excess losses + ballast value). An employer with losses better than the class average receives an experience mod below 1.00, reducing their premium. An employer with worse-than-average losses receives a mod above 1.00. The formula is calibrated so that the average employer in each class has an experience mod of approximately 1.00.
Loss Cost Development and Rate Making
Workers' compensation involves long-tailed liabilities, particularly for permanent disability and medical benefits that may extend decades. Loss development patterns are among the longest in property-casualty insurance, with some claims remaining open 20 or more years after the injury date. This long development tail means that actuaries must project ultimate losses from relatively immature data when setting rates for current policies.
The rate-making process begins with collecting loss and premium data by class code and state. Historical losses are developed to ultimate using loss development factors specific to workers' compensation. These factors account for the long settlement periods of indemnity claims (particularly permanent total disability claims) and the extended duration of medical payments. Losses are then trended forward to the prospective policy period, accounting for expected changes in claim frequency and severity.
Loss cost trending requires separate analysis of frequency and severity trends, as these often move in different directions. Workers' compensation claim frequency has generally declined over the past several decades, driven by workplace safety improvements, automation of dangerous tasks, and the shift from manufacturing to service-sector employment. Severity trends, particularly for medical costs, have generally been increasing, driven by medical inflation, advances in treatment that keep injured workers alive longer, and the rising cost of prescription drugs (particularly opioids and their alternatives).
Benefit Structure and State Variation
Workers' compensation benefits are mandated by state law and typically include medical benefits (covering all reasonable and necessary medical treatment related to the work injury), temporary total disability benefits (replacing a portion of lost wages during recovery), permanent partial disability benefits (compensating for lasting impairment), permanent total disability benefits (for workers who can never return to work), and death benefits (for dependents of workers killed on the job).
Benefit levels vary significantly across states. Temporary total disability benefits are typically calculated as two-thirds of the worker's average weekly wage, subject to a state-mandated maximum that varies from state to state. Medical benefits may be subject to fee schedules that cap reimbursement rates for specific procedures, or they may be reimbursed at usual and customary rates. These state-specific benefit structures mean that the same injury can produce very different claim costs depending on where it occurs, requiring state-specific rate development.
Retrospective Rating and Large Deductible Programs
Retrospective rating plans adjust premiums after the policy period based on actual losses. The retrospective premium formula is: Retrospective Premium = (Basic Premium + Converted Losses) times Tax Multiplier, subject to a minimum and maximum premium. The basic premium covers fixed expenses, the insurance charge for limiting the maximum premium, and the savings from the minimum premium. Converted losses equal the actual incurred losses multiplied by a loss conversion factor that accounts for allocated loss adjustment expenses.
Large deductible programs are common for major employers who wish to retain a significant portion of their workers' compensation risk. Under a large deductible program, the insurer issues a policy and handles claims administration, but the employer reimburses the insurer for losses below the deductible level. Deductibles of $100,000 to $1,000,000 per occurrence are common. The insurer's premium reflects only the losses expected above the deductible, plus administrative fees, excess loss charges, and collateral requirements to protect against the employer's potential inability to reimburse.
Key Actuarial Challenges
Actuaries must account for medical cost inflation, legal environment changes, and benefit level adjustments mandated by state legislatures. Legislative reforms can dramatically alter the cost of workers' compensation claims by changing benefit formulas, modifying medical fee schedules, or altering the criteria for compensability. Actuaries must assess the prospective impact of these changes on loss costs, which requires understanding both the legal details of the reform and the likely behavioral responses of employers, employees, medical providers, and attorneys.
The opioid crisis and its aftermath have significantly affected workers' compensation medical costs. Prescription drug costs, substance abuse treatment, and the long-term medical management of patients with chronic pain conditions all contribute to medical severity trends. More recently, the shift toward evidence-based treatment guidelines and pharmacy benefit management programs has helped moderate prescription drug cost growth, but the impact varies by state and by the specific regulations in place.
Study Tips for Workers' Compensation Pricing
When studying workers' compensation pricing for actuarial exams, focus on understanding the experience rating formula and how it blends individual and class experience. Practice calculating experience modification factors using sample data. Understand the components of the retrospective rating formula and how the minimum and maximum premiums create a corridor within which the employer bears risk. Be familiar with the loss cost development and trending process, and understand why separate treatment of frequency and severity trends is important. These topics appear frequently on CAS exams and are directly applicable to actuarial practice.